View Full Version : Legacy L curb weight?
grayguy
09-05-2011, 12:50 AM
What does a 97' legacy L sedan weigh? Google is failing me.
lord flashheart
09-05-2011, 02:59 AM
shit i think it was 3125lbs or so.
i know it was like 83 lbs lighter than the first gen
StatGSR
09-05-2011, 10:20 AM
http://www.cars101.com/
http://www.cars101.com/subaru_legacy_archive95_97.html
97 - "Curb Weight- sedans: 2885-3160" should be on the lower end while the GT and LSi is on the higher end...
grayguy
09-05-2011, 02:25 PM
Yeah, thats the same range I kept finding, I was just wondering how it compared to a GC coupe...for a reference on a ballpark feel of HP vs. Weight when I put a 2.5 in...because the GT I had feels WAY slower than our GC 2.5 coupe....
Wiscon_Mark
09-05-2011, 06:43 PM
I have a link around here somewhere to a detailed list...
edit: I can't find it, but there's a list on Nasioc with a detail breakdown, by model, model year, trim, etc that'll give you a more accurate answer.
Otherwise find a bulk scale :lol:
lord flashheart
09-05-2011, 06:50 PM
Yeah, thats the same range I kept finding, I was just wondering how it compared to a GC coupe...for a reference on a ballpark feel of HP vs. Weight when I put a 2.5 in...because the GT I had feels WAY slower than our GC 2.5 coupe....
factor in which 2.5 it had? and also gear ratio?
Wiscon_Mark
09-05-2011, 09:20 PM
Ah! Found it!
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthr ... urb+weight (http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=915025&highlight=curb+weight)
Looks like yours is 2885 with the manual, 2965 with the automatic. That might be dry weight, I'm not sure. Fascinating list though.
peter
09-06-2011, 04:02 AM
Ah! Found it!
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthr ... urb+weight (http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=915025&highlight=curb+weight)
Looks like yours is 2885 with the manual, 2965 with the automatic. That might be dry weight, I'm not sure. Fascinating list though.
According to that my Legacy is 3965. Must be a typo lol
Wiscon_Mark
09-06-2011, 01:00 PM
I'm sure they meant 2965
grayguy
09-07-2011, 12:20 AM
Yeah, thats the same range I kept finding, I was just wondering how it compared to a GC coupe...for a reference on a ballpark feel of HP vs. Weight when I put a 2.5 in...because the GT I had feels WAY slower than our GC 2.5 coupe....
factor in which 2.5 it had? and also gear ratio?
Well I know the 3.90 in the L is gonna be less "peppy" feeling that the 4.11s in an RS. And it's 98" dohc going in the L vs a 99' Sohc.
I had an eg33 lined up but that fell through, that's still the most ideal option as far as NA goes.
Wiscon_Mark
09-07-2011, 08:14 PM
The 3.9 is just fine in a 2.2L, I'm sure it'll be good with a 2.5L especially if you give it some mods.
grayguy
09-08-2011, 12:21 AM
I'm not about to swap tranny/diffs in this car, so it's keeping the 3.90. I'm not to concerned about power, I was more just interested in how it will compare.
lord flashheart
09-08-2011, 03:06 AM
i really like the EG33. its a damn good motor, we have built them to 600HP before.
but in terms of a N/A motor i still like the 2.5
you can make well over 200HP with it.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.