Log in

View Full Version : Component review: Vorshlag Camber Plates



Bimmerman
09-23-2011, 06:18 PM
As some of you know, I recently bought GD-fitment AST 4100 coilovers for my BK. After working with Vorshlag and AST to develop a BK-compatible rear shock internals, I then drove from CO to CA for grad school. There was a teething period on the rear shocks (wagons are...odd), since I'm Subaru wagon #2 in the country running these according to AST. Wagon rear geometry is different enough to sedans to cause an issue, which we found out and AST and Vorshlag corrected. Vorshlag's customer service is also top notch, they have gone out of their way to help me with these issues. I've got ~2000 miles on the setup now, and while the ASTs are awesome, the camber plates have impressed me more.

With all of the confusion on what the top hat patterns are on a BD/K/G, and which impreza coilover tops bolt straight on correctly, I figure I'll clear that up as well (see pictures): GC front top pattern, GD rear. Any other pattern and adjustments WILL NOT WORK CORRECTLY.

On to the main event: Why I wrote this review. Subarus have pathetic amounts of caster from the factory, and there is really no way to increase it on our cars with factory adjustments. Why do you want caster? Caster affects just about everything from a suspension point of view- dynamic camber gain/loss, steering response, self-centering, stability, and more. My 95 BK had 3 degrees of caster stock. My M3 has more than double that, and it has far better steering response, turn in, and camber curves, to name a few. You cannot have too much caster on a Subaru. It just isn't possible to get enough to have an issue.

Now, why am I talking about caster when the Vorshlag units are camber plates? Because Subarus really don't need much camber (autox excluded). Caster is far more important than adding camber for our cars.

The 95-99 Legacy is a weird hodgepodge of GC and GD suspension mounting points and oddball geometry. The front top mount pattern is GC-specific while the rear is GD specific. Believing the forum, I ordered Vorshlag's "high caster" front GC camber plates and rear GD plates. See the pictures below, they are beautiful units. The workmanship is amazing and readily apparent on these, as is the significant amount of engineering time and thought put in to how they function.

High caster steel fronts:
https://sl-i.net/FORUM/images/imported/2011/09/DSC2254L-1.jpg

GD rears (anodized aluminum)
https://sl-i.net/FORUM/images/imported/2011/09/DSC2400L-1.jpg

Many folks buying coilovers buy camber and caster adjustable plates. I've never understood this, since you want max caster all the time. As you can see from my installed pictures, you have max caster at all times and significant camber adjustment. When I had the lower camber bolt and the plate maxed out, I was getting close to -6 degrees of camber in the front. The rear is another story-- GD struts expect a wider track than a BK/BD can provide, so they add a LOT of positive camber. With the plates maxed out in the rear, I got -1 degree of camber, which is frankly plenty for these cars. With lower camber bolts or lateral links you could get much more negative, but you don't need it in 99% of applications.

Plate on the shock pre-install
https://sl-i.net/FORUM/images/imported/2011/09/fsXO2-1.jpg
https://sl-i.net/FORUM/images/imported/2011/09/xjMli-1.jpg

Look at where the shock is located in the strut tower, there is no way to add any more caster up top. Note how a GC top pattern is clearly correct for a coilover plate. GC top pattern allows camber adjustment without any significant corresponding change in caster.
https://sl-i.net/FORUM/images/imported/2011/09/KlFQa-1.jpg

GD plates in the rear allow for pure camber-only adjustment.
https://sl-i.net/FORUM/images/imported/2011/09/LD8Ln-1.jpg

Back to caster now. The Vorshlag high caster plates were advertised as adding 1 degree on a GC. I got before and after alignments to see how much the plates actually add, and was astonished. The car was aligned to 100% stock settings for camber and toe (before/after coils) since I was going to drive 1500 miles to California. The front plates added 1.8 degrees of positive (good) caster, just by bolting them on. At -2.6 camber they add 2.2 degrees of caster. Note: I do not have an anti-lift kit of any sort. This increase was purely from the plates.

Numbers are great and all, but the greatest test is behind the wheel. My car has such better steering feel that it really is hilarious the difference just these plates made. I'd highly recommend the front GC plates and rear GD plates to anyone doing a coilover install, since Vorshlag has a dizzing array of perches and bearings to fit different shock brands (Koni, Bilstein, JRZ, Moton, AST, and more) as well as spring ID and style-- they have stock perches available as well. These plates have no rubber in them yet are absolutely silent in daily operation and do not require oil or maintenance at all.

Overall, I am extremely impressed with the plates and highly highly highly recommend them for anyone wanting to improve their steering response and how their car reacts and behaves in sporty use. If there were any downsides, it is that you definitely feel the road much more (I love it) but some might not. Bumps are also harsher since the shock-plate-chassis interface has zero bushing material. It is scary fun how well this car handles now. Too bad its chassis is so noodly.

Fair disclosure, I have Vorshlag plates on my M3 also, which haven't been touched at all in 3+ years and are still silent, rock solid, and their settings have not slipped.

r3v_v3ng3
10-04-2011, 10:51 PM
price on these?

Wiscon_Mark
10-06-2011, 06:17 PM
You said they were stiffer, but how much extra noise would you say you have due to these?

Bimmerman
11-17-2011, 05:38 AM
price on these?

Camber plates are each $419 for front or rear when bought separately, considerably less when combined with shocks.



You said they were stiffer, but how much extra noise would you say you have due to these?

Actually not much at all. The plates themselves are silent, it's transmitted road noise since there is no rubber in the strut tops anymore.

jamal
11-17-2011, 04:51 PM
vorshlag/ast stuff is awesome, nice setup.

I have the whiteline com-c plates, which when installed on a BD/GC are angled such that they add a lot more caster (http://jamalb.net/pictures/shifter/IMG_4608.JPG).

csweston
04-19-2012, 03:22 PM
Sorry for the bump, but I have a question regaurding this set up. Im looking at going with the Vorshlag plates when I get my coilovers in. However, im a bit confused now. Why wouldnt you use the GD plates up front as well? Or are they parctically the same thing. Also would chamber bolts still be needed in the rear to get stock chaber, or are the adjustable top hats enough.


Never mind, answered my own question. GD front tops need to be rotated (switched side to side) making the adjustments off. GC does not.

Bimmerman
04-20-2012, 06:06 AM
Sorry for the bump, but I have a question regaurding this set up. Im looking at going with the Vorshlag plates when I get my coilovers in. However, im a bit confused now. Why wouldnt you use the GD plates up front as well? Or are they parctically the same thing. Also would chamber bolts still be needed in the rear to get stock chaber, or are the adjustable top hats enough.


Never mind, answered my own question. GD front tops need to be rotated (switched side to side) making the adjustments off. GC does not.

Mostly, yes. GD plates will still be angled relative to the GC plates. Look at the picture of mine with the front plates, you can see how camber adjusts in a straight line with no caster change. Remember that the point of these plates is to maximize caster, so having the adjustment is pretty pointless with this design. Now, look at the following picture:

https://sl-i.net/FORUM/images/imported/2012/04/attachmentphpattachmentid2250stc1d130015-1.jpg

Notice the camber plate alignment-- the adjustments are not isolated, so decreasing camber decreases caster. Not a good solution whatsoever. Using GD front plates will look similar but won't be exact. Easiest solution is to just use the GC front plates paired with GD rear. That way you have maximum caster regardless of camber setting, which is what you want.

As far as rear camber goes on a wagon, you WILL need bolts or plates or adjustable lower arms. You need some method of adjustment, otherwise you'll get a lot of positive camber in the rear.

FWIW, with the rear plates maxed on negative camber, I can only get -1 degrees of camber, which is stock-ish. Plenty for street use, but not enough for autocross or performance use.

csweston
04-21-2012, 01:12 AM
Thanks for the reply!

So ideally for autox youd have the rear camber bolts and adjustable top hats?

Bimmerman
04-21-2012, 06:42 AM
Thanks for the reply!

So ideally for autox youd have the rear camber bolts and adjustable top hats?

Well....it depends on what class you run. Last I looked, the lower prep level classes only allowed one method of camber adjustment. So whether it's rear camber plates, camber bolts, or adjustable lower arms, you'd pick the one that allows the most camber adjustment. I think there's an exception for original stuff (like front bolts on most Japanese cars) so that you can run camber plates in addition....but I'm not 100% certain.

However, our cars are so hilariously uncompetitive I don't think anyone would protest you for running two methods of adjustment until you start challenging for class trophies. I'm not a fan of the bolts, so I'd run the adjustable lateral links myself combined with the camber plates up top.

csweston
04-21-2012, 06:15 PM
Thanks for the info. Ill look more into the requirements and see which direction to go.