mranlet
04-23-2006, 01:20 AM
As some of you may know, my BG Wagon is RWD with an R200 differential from a S14 Nissan 240SX.
The recent failure of my right rear wheel bearing has gotten me thinking about the possibility of converting my current rear suspension to use Infiniti J30 or Nisssan Z rear suspension uprights and OEM Nissan axles. This conversion would also change my bolt pattern to 5x114 and allow me to use whatever wheel offset I want up through the insane lip ranges without having to worry about wheel bearing failure.
I will also most likely convert my front suspension to Mk III Toyota Supra double-wishbone, which is a less major task. The advantages of double wishbone are improved handling, independent camber adjustment and variable kingpin angle (hugely important for establishing scrub radius and wheel offsets). Downsides are the increased number of moving parts and complexity of engineering. Strut suspension is good because it's simple and works with a lot of what I've already got, but the handling and adjustability aren't as good.
The aspect in which I'm looking for input is whether to retain the Subaru lateral link/trailing arm/strut setup, to convert to double wishbone, or to design a combination of suspension systems.
DOUBLE WISHBONE:
Would incorporate 3 main arms; a lower A-arm, an upper A-arm and a TC/Trailing arm. The lower A-arm and TC rod would anchor to the stock lateral link and trailing arm pickups respectively, while the upper A-arm would anchor to new hardpoints along the inside edge of the wheel wells (forward of the fuel filler neck on the right side). This setup would resemble Honda CRX rear suspension, but it would utilize a real lower A-arm and real TC rod rather than a spindle-type arm. Toe control would have to be managed by an additional link on the aft side of the subframe. Lower shock mount would be composed of a pillow ball joint at the end of a bracket that mates to the OEM Subaru strut mount on the top end and to the lower A-arm on the bottom.
LATERAL LINK:
OEM Subaru suspension geometry would be retained, but the donor hubs would be extensively modified to receive 2 lateral links and a trailing arm on each side. My major concern with this setup is that a double wishbone front suspension and strut-style rear will make for poor handling properties.
HYBRID SETUP:
Lateral Links and Trailing arms would both be retained with the addition of an upper A-arm. This would allow for toe control with the accuracy of double-wishbone setup. Clearance may become an issue in this setup, but this is my leading option so far.
Let me know what you guys think. Thanks for any input!
The recent failure of my right rear wheel bearing has gotten me thinking about the possibility of converting my current rear suspension to use Infiniti J30 or Nisssan Z rear suspension uprights and OEM Nissan axles. This conversion would also change my bolt pattern to 5x114 and allow me to use whatever wheel offset I want up through the insane lip ranges without having to worry about wheel bearing failure.
I will also most likely convert my front suspension to Mk III Toyota Supra double-wishbone, which is a less major task. The advantages of double wishbone are improved handling, independent camber adjustment and variable kingpin angle (hugely important for establishing scrub radius and wheel offsets). Downsides are the increased number of moving parts and complexity of engineering. Strut suspension is good because it's simple and works with a lot of what I've already got, but the handling and adjustability aren't as good.
The aspect in which I'm looking for input is whether to retain the Subaru lateral link/trailing arm/strut setup, to convert to double wishbone, or to design a combination of suspension systems.
DOUBLE WISHBONE:
Would incorporate 3 main arms; a lower A-arm, an upper A-arm and a TC/Trailing arm. The lower A-arm and TC rod would anchor to the stock lateral link and trailing arm pickups respectively, while the upper A-arm would anchor to new hardpoints along the inside edge of the wheel wells (forward of the fuel filler neck on the right side). This setup would resemble Honda CRX rear suspension, but it would utilize a real lower A-arm and real TC rod rather than a spindle-type arm. Toe control would have to be managed by an additional link on the aft side of the subframe. Lower shock mount would be composed of a pillow ball joint at the end of a bracket that mates to the OEM Subaru strut mount on the top end and to the lower A-arm on the bottom.
LATERAL LINK:
OEM Subaru suspension geometry would be retained, but the donor hubs would be extensively modified to receive 2 lateral links and a trailing arm on each side. My major concern with this setup is that a double wishbone front suspension and strut-style rear will make for poor handling properties.
HYBRID SETUP:
Lateral Links and Trailing arms would both be retained with the addition of an upper A-arm. This would allow for toe control with the accuracy of double-wishbone setup. Clearance may become an issue in this setup, but this is my leading option so far.
Let me know what you guys think. Thanks for any input!